<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=429271514207517&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Screen Shot 2018-03-28 at 1.33.04 PM

Richard Caperton: Master Limited Partnerships Could Have "Huge Impact" on Clean Energy in US

2 min. read

Video: Danny Kennedy Gives TEDx Talk on "How Profit Will Save the Planet"

0 min. read

"Degradable Plastic Bag" Manufacturer Makes False Claims About Product

3 min. read

Recently, our dog chewed up our 10-years-old family compost bin. The new, metal bin we purchased came with "degradable" (e.g., not "BIOdegradable") bags by a company called Norpro. The Norpro bags claim to be safe to throw into your compost pile, where they degrade. But degrade into what exactly? Won't the bag simply break down into small plastic particles that then contaminate the compost, which in turn we use to fertilize the vegetables we eventually eat? Or are we missing something here?

So, we contacted Norpro to see what we could find out. First, we called the company's customer service line (877-879-1360), and were told that we needed to contact their corporate number (800-722-0202). We called them at that number and asked the same question. We were told that they weren't able to answer the question, and that we should email their sales department.

Before we did that, we checked Norpro's website, where the company presents its bags as being "[m]ade of 100% degradable and compostable material" and "[e]ndorsed by ISAB and OPI" (note: there's no indication on the Norpro website what ISAB and OPI might be, exactly). We then emailed the company, told them our understanding is that degradable plastics are still petroleum based, and asked whether these plastics wouldn't still pollute the environment and potentially harm our health, especially if used for composting purposes?

In response, we received a page of information on Norpro's degradable compost bags. Among the claims made on this sheet were a couple that seemed dubious:

New Research: Cleantechers Have to Win the Race to Define, Not Just “Respond”

1 min. read

According to a recent TechCrunch story, "when untruthful information is immediately corrected in a news story," it doesn't fix the effect. In fact, a new study concludes, calling out false information can paradoxically make users “more resistant to factual information." Or, as the TechCrunch article puts it: "The more truth we read, the more we tend to believe strongly held lies."

How Green Can We Get? Our Journey Starts With a Broken Motor.

1 min. read

by Mike Casey

Former Virginia Governor Tim Kaine at Tigercomm Clean Energy Forum on Combating Anti-Clean-Energy “Theology”

2 min. read

Growing the Options: Showing the Clean Economy is Good Politics and Policies

2 min. read

Why Does Southwest Airlines Junk Its Brand? [UPDATED]

3 min. read

I’ve been a fan of Southwest Airlines for years. It’s not luxury, but it usually gets you there with a passenger-friendly, problem-solving approach to customers’ needs. But here’s a standout exception that suggests that even Southwest can be careless with its brand: Just try to get them to stop sending you junk mail.

Creator of “Texts from Hillary” Explains the Anatomy of Buzz

3 min. read

Stacy Lambe: Is Media Heading Towards the BuzzFeed Model?

1 min. read